Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn MacBook Pro Retina. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn MacBook Pro Retina. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Bảy, 1 tháng 12, 2012

Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display Notebook Review - Part II

Macbook Pro With Retina Display Test

Another laptop could work out from this horrible day capacious battery. But the MacBook Pro with Retina display is greedy enough - obviously, the main consumer in this case is the display. Test result with minimal impact on the components of good: in this mode, the laptop is able to last a really long time.
But in a more realistic scenario - when viewing Full HD-video with a maximum brightness of the display - the result is reduced by more than half, to six and a small hours. Typically, the scenario of wireless Internet surfing gives about the same results. So Apple announced 7:00 should more or less correspond to reality, subject to the average brightness of the display and running in the background without heavy applications. In practice will probably 5.6 hours, which, in general, too bad.
Apple is the only company not switched to the matrix with a 16:9 aspect ratio - as in the classic MacBook Pro, set the display to AMBPwRd 15.4''. Similarity to the "normal" MacBook on this part. Retina display is not only better resolution - 1440x900 2880h1800 against - but also quality. This is the only laptop Apple, which used IPS-matrix. Display, as in all the MacBook Pro, covered with glass, but in this case, added a very effective anti-reflection coating significantly reduces the intensity of glare.
Anti-reflection coating MacBook Pro wRd significantly reduces the brightness of illumination. Compare this with the usual glossy display or screen -covered glass Gorilla Glass
The matrix does not put records on the part of the brightness. According to our measurements, the luminosity of the white box in the center of the display at the maximum level of illumination was a little more than 280 cd / m 2. Bright, but, they say, without fanaticism. In any case, the work in the sun will prevent Blick glass - so turn up the brightness to the skies just do not make sense.
But the luminosity of the black field in the same conditions is only 0.4 cd / m 2 . And on the bottom half of the range of variation of light luminosity is so low that our device - Datacolor Spyder4 - do not adequately measure it.
Accordingly, the contrast reaches almost 700:1, which is quite a lot even for mobile IPS-matrix, much of notebook TN - it's just an impossible height.
Some manufacturers to raise the overall brightness use a "transparent" color filters, which are "domeshivayut" in extra white color component. Because of this color range is obtained insufficient. The Apple did not use this trick, so that coverage is almost the sRGB - indeed, even in conventional MacBook Pro 15 color range is about the same.
Another thing is that through the use of IPS-matrix color subjectively perceived better than in the case of TN: excellent viewing angle IPS-display avoid color distortion due to the different angle of view on different points of the display.
Overall, the display is good in almost every way - except for the fact that he is still noticeable glare. However, with a matte finish highest resolution "retinoic" display, obviously, would not give such a sharp image, so that the model is not even available as an option.
Do not forget the developers and about the sound: in Apple at every opportunity, do not miss the opportunity to tell that in the MacBook Pro with Retina display used the best speakers you have ever put in a notebook with an apple on the cover. We have not had the opportunity to compare the head-at least to the MacBook Pro 15. But what the speakers sound really great - it's a fact.
Despite the very serious stuffing, laptop weighs quite moderate - a little more than the mass of 2 kilograms. The Classic MacBook Pro 15 is for about a pound heavier than the MacBook Pro 13 a few tens of grams.
Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display
ProcessorIntel Core i7-3610QM: 2,3 GHz (up to 3.3 GHz mode Turbo Boost) 
4x256 KB L2 
6 MB L3 
four cores
Graphics ControllerAutomatically switchable graphics: Intel HD 4000 integrated in the processor 
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M (GK107), 1 GB GDDR5
Screen15.4 inches, 2880h1800, technology IPS 
glossy coating with anti-reflection layer, LED-backlight
Random access memory8 GB DDR3L-1600 (soldered on the motherboard, there is no expansion slots)
HDD256 GB SSD (Apple SM256E) 
Non-standard form factor
Optical DriveNone
Jack flash cardsSD (SDHC / SDXC)
Interfaces2 x USB 3.0 
2 x Thunderbolt 
1 x HDMI 
1 x headphones (mini-jack 3,5 mm)
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n (Apple AirPort Extreme - Broadcom BCM4331)
Bluetooth4.0 (Broadcom BCM20702)
Network adapter10/100/1000 (Broadcom BCM57100, running through an adapter connected to the Thunderbolt)
SoundTwo speakers, two microphones
FoodPack of 6 different size flat items 92.6 Wh (8460 mAh, 10.95 V) 
power supply 85 W (20 V, 4.25 A)
OtherMetal body and cover, backlit keyboard, a light sensor, the webcam
Size in mm359x247x18
Weight, kg2.015
Operating systemMac OS X 10.7.4
Official manufacturer warranty12 months
Price range in the U.S.From $ 2199 to $ 3749
For younger configuration is only one option - increasing the memory. But you can not build up the drive - it is necessary to choose the version with a more powerful processor, which immediately is $600 more expensive.

Younger configurationOlder configurationOptions
ProcessorCore i7-3610QMCore i7-3720QMCore i7-3820QM (+ $ 250)
Memory8 GB8 GB16 GB (+ $ 200)
SSD256 GB512 GB768 GB (+ $ 500)
Price$1199$1879$2149

In the U.S. the price traditionally do not include taxes, which vary from state to state. In Euro, by the time when the notebook will appear in the domestic market, prices should be roughly in line with European - the same numbers, but in euros instead of dollars. But while there is no official supply, the price can be almost anyone. 

Conclusion
Excellent display, great sound, serious performance, good battery life, comfortable keyboard with backlight, communication connectors to suit every taste - all in a fairly compact and lightweight metal body. Apple has got to make the perfect laptop for every day.
The only sadness for those who are not willing to pay about $2 000-$3000 for flagship Apple laptop, for quite some time will have to be content with the "usual» MacBook Pro, which in the past year, we have looked archaic, but in the era of ultrabook and does steel whisk to some endangered species such as horse-drawn carts or cards Memory Stick.
As for alternatives, there are only two - and both have significant drawbacks. Say, a 15-inch Samsung 900X4C compact and weighs considerably less, but its performance is lower and the quality of the image display leaves a lot, lot better. In the Sony VAIO SE establish serious processors and graphics cards, as well as IPS-panel displays, albeit not "retinoic." But this laptop loses visual appeal and battery life.In fact, even if we forget about the resolution 2880x1800, direct competitors MacBook Pro with Retina display is simply not.

Thứ Năm, 4 tháng 10, 2012

Apple MacBook Pro 15" Retina Review



This is a review for Apple MacBook Pro 15" (2012 model) with a Retina screen (2880x1800). This laptop is for professional programmers.  Why is  it so complicated? The answer is in this review.




Content

  • Characteristics
  • And photo
  • Screen
  • Performance


Key Features:
Processor: Intel Core i7-3615QM, 4 cores / 8 threads, the frequency of 2.3 GHz, 6 MB cache in the third level.  
Based architecture: Ivy Bridge Based, made ​​on the 22-nm process technology and includes new graphics core HD Graphics 4000. Maximum clock speed when downloading a single core - 3.3 GHz. Max TDP 45 W.  
In simple terms, a regular user will not see the difference in speed of the CPU compared to the previous generation.


Intel ® Core ™ i7-3615QM Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.30 GHz)



Integrated Graphics Processor Intel HD Graphics 4000 with 512 MB. On average, equal to 20-30% of the performance of Intel HD Graphics 3000.



Frequency of the GPU





As for the discrete graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M, it proved better than Radeon HD 6750M, even faster in some tests by 5-10%.



In the game Portal 2 (resolution 1680x1050) MacBook Pro 15 Retina showed 54.8 fps, and MacBook Pro 15 (2011) - 45.2 fps.




256Gb SSD drive that supports TRIM. Test results showed significantly greater speed reading and writing of data than the MacBook Air SSD 2011.  

Details below is in the performance section. Increase size SSD drive with 256Gb to 512Gb or 768Gb possible by replacing this down:


 

SSD produced by Samsung (830 series)
  
C replacement 8Gb memory it is worse, most of all, it can not be replaced without replacing the motherboard because the memory soldered into it. 



Hynix H5TC2G83CFR DDR3L SDRAM

Bluetooth 4.0 applied low power consumption by using a special algorithm. The transmitter is activated only while sending data, which allows operation on a single battery type CR2032 for several years. Standard provides a data rate of 1 Mbit / s data packet size 8-27 bytes. The new version of two Bluetooth-enabled devices can connect in less than 5 milliseconds, and keep it at a distance of 100 m is used for this advanced error correction, and the required level of security provides 128-bit AES-encryption.


Assembly is standard for laptops Apple - this is the power cord and adapter to an electrical outlet, printed documentation, MagSafe power adapter 2, the laptop and all. There is no proprietary USB-stick, instead, there is a separate section Recovery HD to restore the system and install Lion. It should be noted that the owners of MacBook Pro and Air 2012 will be free upgrade to OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion.





Power supply: MagSafe 2 up to 85W with a modified connector. Its magnetic part has become thinner and wider, so the old power supply new laptops are not compatible, but it can be fixed by purchasing an adapter with MagSafe at MagSafe 2 for $10.






Full-sized touchpad. Backlit keyboard. 
All done on 5 +





New MagSafe power connector 2, two ports Thunderbolt (data transfer rate up to 10Gbps), two ports USB 3.0 (one on each side), headphone jack, full-size HDMI port and a slot for SD, available for USB 3.0.



Unfortunately, MacBook Pro (Retina) lost RJ-45 connectors. If you want it, then you will need to separately purchase an adapter.

(Adapter Apple Thunderbolt Gigabit Ethernet ) comparison with the size of iPad 2






Fans dig deeper in the guts of the laptop will need to 
buy a special screwdriver




The back cover is modified. First, there is an inscription in both MacBook Pro and in the iPad.



Second, there are the ventilation holes on the sides for cool air intake and better cooling. As for the heat and noise, while browsing the site, work with office documents and watching videos, the laptop is behaving totally silent. 


Fans spinning at 2 thousand revs. Case becomes warm in the top of the keyboard, next to the touchpad, where the palm touch. By the way, the fan blades are different lengths and thus the noise from them is more pleasant to the ear, though in volume when the CPU utilization is at 100% laptop noise as well as the previous model MacBook Pro.
During video encoding in synthetic benchmarks and in games laptop noticeably warm, but not burn). 





Is the MacBook Pro Retina really thin? 

Differences compared with conventional Proshka noticeable immediately, because the laptop is not small in size (length, width), the effect of such a small thickness (1.8 cm) more apparent.

Reduced weight to 2.2 kg (for MacBook Pro 15 "2011 - 2.56 kg), also fell for him. Notebook easier to carry, but easily MacBook Air did not compare ...





Briefly about Baubles. Power button is now located in a block of function keys, as the MacBook Air.







This laptop is present just two microphones, one of which suppresses background noise. The recording quality can be evaluated in the survey Mountain Lion (see video at the end of the review).


During the presentation, the Apple MacBook Pro 15"(Retina) was to focus on improving the quality of the sound. To my mind, or rather hearing, speakers sound grew louder, with no creaking at maximum volume is not, and that's all the bass is also not enough.

FaceTime camera can now shoot video in 720p.


Retina Display 

Glossy widescreen display with a diagonal of 15 "inch LED backlit with a huge resolution of 2880x1800 (density of 220 ppi).


The display has a very good IPS-matrix with excellent viewing angles and excellent color reproduction. Pixels on a screen is not visible, this is equivalent to a change from iPad 2 in the iPad 3, and we get a huge 15" Retina display.



If you have a good vision, you can configure the image that all items on the screen and the text will be large and blurred. Medium size is recommended, which corresponds to the scaled resolution of 1440x900 on a standard MacBook Pro 15".


How are applications that are not optimized for the Retina? I detailed in the video review later, and then just want to note that when viewing site in Safari, fonts are clear, but the graphics have a markedly inferior resolution (This was particularly noticeable on OS X 10.7 Lion). 

After installing the OS X Mountain Lion GM, I enable anti-aliasing and all the graphics on sites with low resolution bit lost in the definition, but it disappeared ladder. The pictures are difficult to show, as in the screenshots, but I think you can evaluate that applications are not optimized for retinitis we blur (pixel) text and graphics. 



Performance

Almost immediately I put the OS X Mountain Lion GM and it had a positive impact on the overall animation interface. Browsing, animation system interface, everything is now working much better, but you need to disable the integrated graphics (Intel HD 4000) and use NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M, otherwise settling fps in animation interface will be visible to the eye.
 
By the way, to upgrade from Lion Mountain Lion on MacBook Pro 15 (Retina) 2.3GHz took only 14 minutes. During the upgrade, I absolutely did not hear any noise from the laptop, just peace and quiet.

 
I was very pleased with performance in games, clearly this can be seen in a video review on the example of Dirt 2 (see video at the end of the review). I note only that if the laptop is running on battery power, not the network, the game performance drops significantly. now turn to the synthetic tests, and before that give measurements in time on and off the laptop.

 Start and stop times
(Three measurements carried out, the results below)
Inclusion 15.15, 16.04, 15.46 seconds.
Shutdown 2.20, 2.0, 2.10 sec



Xbench tests 


Unfortunately, OS X Mountain Lion is not working Test Thread Test, so the total score is not worth watching, but on certain other tests, including test drive SSD, it is already possible to see and appreciate. To compare the test results led MacBook Air 13 "Core i7 1.8 GHz (2011), MacBook Air 6.11 "previous generation (Intel Core 2 Duo 01.04 GHz ) and MacBook Pro 15 ", Core i5 2.4GHz (MC371). As stated, the figures speak for themselves.

CPU Test 

  • MacBook Pro 15 "Retina, Core i7 2.3 GHz (2012) - 264.00
  • MacBook Air 13 ", Core i7 1.8 GHz (2011) - 216.44
  • MacBook Pro 15 ", Core i5 2.4GHz (2010) - 191.96
  • MacBook Air 11.6 ", Core 2 Duo 1.4 GHz (2010) - 98.36

Memory Test

  • MacBook Pro 15 "Retina, Core i7 2.3 GHz (2012) - 662.15
  • MacBook Air 13 ", Core i7 1.8 GHz (2011) - 553.35
  • MacBook Pro 15 ", Core i5 2.4GHz (2010) - 303.72
  • MacBook Air 11.6 ", Core 2 Duo 1.4 GHz (2010) - 137.45

Disk Test 

  • MacBook Pro 15 "Retina, Core i7 2.3 GHz (2012) SSD - 485.53 (speed record over 400Mb/sec!)
  • MacBook Air 13 ", Core i7 1.8 GHz (2011) SSD - 362.39
  • MacBook Pro 15 ", Core i5 2.4GHz (2010) HDD - 51.14
  • Apple MacBook Air 11.6 ", Core 2 Duo (2010) SSD - 248,536



Separate SSD drive tests GeekBench and CINEBENCH 11.529


  • MacBook Pro 15 "Retina, Core i7 2.3 GHz (2012) - 11,867
  • MacBook Air 13 ", Core i7 1.8 GHz (2011) -  6318
  • MacBook Pro 15 ", Core i5 2.4GHz (MC371LL / A) - 5617
What do you thinkabout the results? Almost twice the result MacBook Air 13 "Core i7 1.8 GHz (2011).



Test results MacBook Air 13 ", Core i7 1.8 GHz (2011).

  

A little more synthetic. Test results CINEBENCH:



Duration of the Apple MacBook Pro 15"(Retina)


Built-in high-capacity removable battery ( up to 7 hours and 30 days standby time ). The battery has a capacity of 8344 mAh.
  • MacBook Pro 15 Retina - 8344 mAh (95 Wh)
  • Apple iPad 3 - 11560 mAh (42.5 Wh)

Explanation: they have different voltage, so different values ​​in watt-hours, and in capacity mAh really have iPad 3 is higher.

So, as I tested it. The test was entirely similar to that which I spent in the review of Apple MacBook Pro 15" Core i5 2.4GHz, MacBook Air 13" Core i7 1.8 GHz (2011) and MacBook Air 11.6" (2010) . before the test MacBook Pro (Retina) was fully charged. Backlit display unscrewed to the maximum, the keyboard backlight is off. Enabled Wi-Fi. During the test, a movie trailer played out "The Legend" (FullHD 1080p) on your player VLC.









So obviously, the MacBook Pro Retina proved itself better than less productive, but long-running MacBook Air 13"(2011), we can safely say that for 6-7 hours of office work MBP Retina enough screen brightness 50-60%.  If talk about the temperature of the CPU and the fan noise, the time to play Full HD video, the temperature of the nuclei not exceed 60 degrees. Fans spun for 2 thousand revolutions in which they absolutely can not hear!







Fans start to grow, only at the processor's temperature over 90 degrees and reach speeds of 4,600 rpm. That's when the noise is very noticeable, but to get to those values, you have to run a synthetic test, which will be a long time to load all CPU cores at 100%.
                    Web browsing synthetic test (100% CPU usage)


  

In other cases (for Web browsing, video, etc.) CPU temperature exceeds 60 degrees, cooler spin at 2000 rpm.






 

Pros and cons of Apple MacBook Pro 15 "(Retina) (2012)

Pro: Classy screen as view angles and details of fonts (not visible pixels)  
Very good endurance for such a powerful stuffing (6-7 hours of continuous charge will)  
Excellent build (solid body), great design, compact size and weight for a 15"laptop.
It is absolutely noiseless when using the Internet, watching video or working with documents (for fan speed does not exceed 2,000 thousand), in this mode, the bottom part of the case, where are the palm stays cool, very good gaming performance; USB 3.0, and a full-size HDMI port.
Cons: Animation interface while facilitating integrated graphics (Intel HD 4000) noticeably limping, to face 18-22fps and visible mikroryvki;   When masshtibirovannom resolution is not clear how it will look at the final result in the monitor with an ordinary resolution.  
A simple example, for instance, you need to make a banner width 520px, if you specify the width of this image on the MacBook Pro Retina, you will get a very small picture and edit it difficult, so the MBP Retina, paradoxically sounds - this laptop is not for the designer, and programmer or a person who is consumed content,    very few applications optimized for Retina resolution and they look, to say the bad;   you need to buy a separate adapter for FireWire and RJ-45.




Conclusions.  

This laptop is ambiguous. It's definitely much like the way dimensions and screen, add here the excellent performance. True, Integrated Graphics Intel HD 4000 for such a huge resolution is weak, so I recommend you to switch to the discrete and enjoy life, apparently, so the Mountain Lion laptop increasingly defaults to the GT 650M graphics card.    

The Apple Macbook Pro 15" With Retina Screen is the laptop of the future. I met only one site, the schedule on which the resolution is optimized for Retina and it is the official website of Apple, also have big problems with applications that look great on the screen, a chic really bad ... 

I am glad that it is dealing with time fix . Currently no Adobe CS6, or Office are not compatible with the retina and in such applications you will receive on-screen pixel font, graphics, and at best, smooth images, but blurred. 

The Apple Macbook Pro 15" With Retina Screen is the perfect laptop for programmers and writers, because on a screen of any text looks clear, and something to code on it a pleasure for the eyes and say thank you. If you are the most time consuming content on a laptop (Web browsing, video, games), this laptop as you will like. Designers, I would not recommend this laptop as a scaled resolution to play with you a malicious joke.

 

Review Apple MacBook Pro 15" Retina Video



Thứ Tư, 26 tháng 9, 2012

My Analysis of Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display


image

All of this morning I have to stay in San Francisco, but instead go for dinner, I decided to spend all my time with the new cheap MacBook Pro. As always, Apple has done an amazing job, catching people good reasons to go to the Apple Store and buy it. Then there are the display, perfect for those who have to look at it all day, and there are a significant reduction in the thickness and weight for those who want the compactness of the four nuclear "machine", hard to miss, and a significant increase in performance GPU / SSD - especially those who are hungry for performance. Despite the fact that the upcoming Haswell will be an excellent option for a truly next-generation MacBook Pro, all of whom have a lot of travel and work while traveling, choose to upgrade to a new laptop right now and tests for Pro SSD.

Let's talk about how Apple has solved the problem of scaling DPI under Lion. In short, users Retina Display MBP got a slider in the "Display Settings", which lets you set resolution higher than 1440 x 900. At 1440 x 900 you will not get any advantages compared to the conventional 15 'MacBook Pro, but it will become clear to the ridiculous. 

If you will do as I have permission to change the «high-res» 1680 x 1050, it will pass. Fortunately, Apple offers Modes 1680 x 1050 and 1920 x 1200, which at the expense of image quality and performance will add real value. You can see each of the five settings in the images Here. So, even for non-integer value scale 1680 x 1050 Retina looks much better than last year's panel of high resolution. It seems that Apple really render at twice the screen resolution before the "put" it in 2880 x 1800 screen (in other words, at 1920 x 1200 Apple renders all at 3840 x 2400 (!) Before to scale - looks like this, but I'm trying to verify this.) In simple terms - it looks much better. Just can not help but notice that the resolution can be changed very quickly. When I work with a lot of documents and tasks, I prefer the resolution 1920 x 1200, but when the turn to his treatment, switch to 1440 x 900 or 1680 x 1050.

image
Less glare, better contrast

In the default (Glossy) MacBook Pro, Apple uses a conventional LCD design of two sheets of glass, plus a third piece of exterior glass, which gives the effect of seamlessness of glass from edge to edge. In MacBook Air and high-res/matovom display is no protective glass and LCD is hidden in the frame. MacBook Pro with Retina uses construction like the MacBook Air and high-res. Instead, the Retina uses two layers of glass of different sizes, as you can see on this slide: Removing the protective glass, Apple reduces the number of glare and reflections, but it is important to remember that this is still a matte screen. Personally, I never bothered glossy screens, so I'm not the right person who should be asking about this.  

Comparing with my matte MacBook Pro, it is certainly more "glossy", but at the same time - not too far away. Most likely, I will be able to make its decision later. As always, Apple decided to fight the glare and reflections, combining high brightness panel with excellent black levels. Retina in MacBook Pro - the first screen, made ​​by IPS panel, which is used in the Apple MacBook. As you can see, the viewing angles are increased several times as well as a level of black brightness is likely an underestimate - compared to last year's model, but the improvement in the level of black make imperceptible loss. But the contrast has made ​​a huge step forward on the old MacBook Pro is still very good screens, but it's - really a new level. Increase the contrast for me is the second - of course, after the increase in resolution.

image





image

image



image

Retina display support in applications

The huge advantage that results from the fact that the supplier of hardware and software for the Mac platform itself is Apple, obviously, will get access to new opportunities and there, and there. Mail, Safari, iPhoto, iMovie, and of course, OS X - all have been updated to support the new MacBook Pro with a screen Retina. These applications all looks absolutely gorgeous on the new Pro. As almost all third-party applications, they have yet to update. 

Many tormenting question: what happens when you run an application that has no support for Retina? ..Let's look at a comparison of Google Chrome and Safari, the best example of the worst of circumstances: At Google, apparently written by its own mechanism for text output outside the work area - which bypasses the standard API for rendering and scaling from Apple. Render Chrome for areas outside of the screen does not know anything about the Retina, and therefore turns out just what was in the picture above. No crime, but I would prefer to use your position to Safari until Chrome will not correct this assumption. I am, if anything, he, too, like Chrome. As for the rest, most developers just need to double-check that they have put up @ 2x images are used in applications - a situation one to one repeats the same as it was with iOS when a Retina .


image


Play at 2880 x 1800

Most likely, you will have noticed that the default OS X does not stretch its interface for Retina native resolution (2880 x 1800). In fact, the 1920 x 1200 - the biggest "resolution" screen, you can set up - and it looks like an attempt to "calm down" users of 17-inch MacBook Pro. And what about 3D gaming? But in games Retina MBP and does not try to hide his true identity. Screenshot above is from Diablo III at resolution of 2880 x 1800.  

Settings page shows the full list of permissions: Diablo III is fully playable at 2880 x 1800. On average, I had 20 fps at a resolution of 2880 x 1800 on the most loaded of the scene to which I got (and I was once a little). Obviously, a lower resolution animation smoother.  

Diablo III throws some artifacts on 1920 x 1200, but it works fine on other 16:10 resolutions. However, not all games allow you to do so. Benchmark Unigine Heaven, for example, will not allow you to put the resolution higher than 1920 x 1200. But Portal 2 - easily.  
On the other hand, the text in the console, Portal 2 certainly points to the fact that many of the games will have to upgrade to the normal support Retina: It becomes clear why Apple did not open directly resolution of 2880 x 1800 under OS X. 

When ASUS introduced a 1080p IPS panel in the new Zenbook Prime, I really liked it. Retina but the new MacBook Pro I like even more. Of course, will take a lot of hours to review all the details, but my assessment is unlikely to be lower.I like it even more than the display on the new iPad, because I often have to use it (I have no desire to type articles on 15,000 words in the iPad).

image



image





image


Some interesting things about Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display

Despite the fact that I want something to reserve for the full review, here are a few comments that have appeared in the course of my tips and tricks of the next-generation MacBook Pro:  

- SD card reader is much better than its predecessor. In my early 2011 15 'MacBook Pro does not read some of the cards without having to insert them-pull again or how to click on them. The new MacBook this problem seems to be solved.  
- It seems that the key travel is at least the keys are not so "springy" as the Sandy Bridge MBP. It's not that bad, just strange. 
- New Pro definitely easier to carry around than the previous unibody-case, but would not say that it feels small. I have a lot to carry a 15 'Pro, so the difference is noticed immediately, but did not expect that it will show me a little more than a MacBook Air, on the other hand, the new Pro feels exactly as it should be felt. 
- Wish for $ 2,199 we get 512GB SSD, and do not get even the possibility to install it,  in either case, I would say close to ideal specifications. Without a standard 2.5'' SSD will not be easy to transfer data to a larger drive. That is all I wanted to say at the moment. You can read for more  news and detailed reviews for Apple Macbook Pro here. 


image